China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Browser Recording and Sharing Functions May Constitute Unfair Competition

Fri, 14 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

In Nov. 2021, Beijing Intellectual Property Court concluded the case of iQiyi v. Qihoo, holding that a browser with the “record-while-streaming” and “one-click sharing” functions constituted unfair competition.

Recording while streaming and one-click sharing are the core functions of Qihoo 360 Browser. With these functions, users who visit iQiyi’s website through 360 Browser can watch and record the work simultaneously through the recording-while-streaming function provided by 360 Browser.

360 Browser offers saving and editing services after the recording. It provides users with the one-click sharing service to distribute the work to third-party platforms such as Today’s Headlines and YouTube.

Beijing Intellectual Property Court held that the above-mentioned functions allow users to bypass technical prevention such as “forbidding downloads” and achieve free distribution of works to which iQiyi has rights.

This has resulted in damage to iQiyi’s operating resources, which further contributes to its loss of subscriber traffic.

Qihoo’s conduct involved has damaged the good order of market competition, and fell into the category of “other acts that prevent or disrupt the normal operation of network products or services lawfully provided by other operators” under Article 12.2.4 of the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” (反不正当竞争法), and thus shall construe as an act of unfair competition.

 

 

Cover Photo by Raymond Lam on Unsplash

 
 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.