China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Browser Recording and Sharing Functions May Constitute Unfair Competition

Fri, 14 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

In Nov. 2021, Beijing Intellectual Property Court concluded the case of iQiyi v. Qihoo, holding that a browser with the “record-while-streaming” and “one-click sharing” functions constituted unfair competition.

Recording while streaming and one-click sharing are the core functions of Qihoo 360 Browser. With these functions, users who visit iQiyi’s website through 360 Browser can watch and record the work simultaneously through the recording-while-streaming function provided by 360 Browser.

360 Browser offers saving and editing services after the recording. It provides users with the one-click sharing service to distribute the work to third-party platforms such as Today’s Headlines and YouTube.

Beijing Intellectual Property Court held that the above-mentioned functions allow users to bypass technical prevention such as “forbidding downloads” and achieve free distribution of works to which iQiyi has rights.

This has resulted in damage to iQiyi’s operating resources, which further contributes to its loss of subscriber traffic.

Qihoo’s conduct involved has damaged the good order of market competition, and fell into the category of “other acts that prevent or disrupt the normal operation of network products or services lawfully provided by other operators” under Article 12.2.4 of the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” (反不正当竞争法), and thus shall construe as an act of unfair competition.

 

 

Cover Photo by Raymond Lam on Unsplash

 
 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.