China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Xiamen Int'l Tribunal Releases Consensual Jurisdiction Model Clauses

Tue, 12 Nov 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

In April 2024, the Xiamen International Commercial Tribunal (hereinafter the “XICT”) released the “Consensual Jurisdiction Model Clauses” (协议管辖示范条款, hereinafter the “Model Clauses”) in both Chinese and English.

The “Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2023 Amendment)” has expanded the jurisdiction of Chinese courts over foreign-related civil cases, emphasizing party autonomy in jurisdiction agreements and abolishing the “actual connection” requirement.

Related Posts:

In this context, the Model Clauses aims to facilitate advance planning and provide guidance to Chinese and foreign commercial entities when entering into trade, investment, and other commercial agreements. The XICT hopes to encourage international commercial parties to choose submit their disputes to its jurisdiction when entering into agreements, positioning the tribunal as a preferred venue for resolving international commercial disputes.

For instance, as the Basic Jurisdiction Clause suggests, “any dispute arising out of or in connection with the present contract (agreement) shall be exclusively and irrevocably submitted to Xiamen International Commercial Tribunal of Fujian province for decision under the jurisdiction of the People’s Republic of China”.

As the accompanying notice indicates, “parties of the present contract (agreement) who adopt this consensual jurisdiction model clauses have explicitly chosen exclusive jurisdiction to avoid parallel proceedings and avail themselves of the extraterritorial judgment recognition and enforcement framework provided by the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements”.

In January 2022, the Xiamen Intermediate People’s Court was approved by China’s Supreme People’s Court to establish the XICT.

Related Posts:

 

Photo by 成 川 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.