China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Adopts First Local Regulation on Commercial Mediation

Thu, 06 Mar 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Nov. 2024, the local legislature of Zhuhai, Guangdong Province (the Standing Committee of the Zhuhai Municipal People’s Congress) adopted the “Commercial Mediation Regulation of the Guangdong-Macao In-Depth Cooperation Zone in Hengqin” (横琴粤澳深度合作区商事调解条例, hereinafter the “Regulation”), which came into effect on 1 Jan. 2025.

As the first local regulation in China to regulate commercial mediation activities, the Regulation has attracted considerable attention since its promulgation. Comprising seven chapters and 39 articles, the Regulation covers commercial mediation organizations, mediators, procedures, mediation agreements, supervision, and legal liabilities.

The highlights of the Regulation are as follows.

  • The Regulation applies to commercial mediation activities carried out by commercial mediation organizations within the cooperation zone. The term “commercial mediation organizations” refers to nonprofit entities legally established within the cooperation zone to provide mediation services.
  • Commercial mediation is conducted independently, free from interference by administrative organs, social organizations, or individuals.
  • The cooperation zone supports commercial mediation organizations, upon meeting domestic regulatory requirements and completing the filing process, in engaging individuals from the Macao SAR, Hong Kong SAR, or other foreign jurisdictions with professional and international credibility as mediators.

 

 

Photo by Joshua Fernandez on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.