China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Amends Anti-Monopoly Law

Mon, 01 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 June 2022, the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress adopted the “Decision on Amending the Anti-Monopoly Law” (《关于修改反垄断法的决定》), which came into effect on 1 Aug. 2022.

The amended Anti-Monopoly Law determines that the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency under the State Council shall be responsible for the unified enforcement of the amended law.

The amended law further targets the digital economy by adding provisions on the use of data and algorithms, stipulating that “Operators shall not use data, algorithms, techniques, capital advantages, platform rules, etc. to engage in monopolistic behavior prohibited by this Law.”

Noteworthy points include the following:

(1) To clarify that the “Anti-Monopoly Law Enforcement Agency under the State Council” is the enforcement agency of the AML.

(2) To further clarify the specific rules for the application of anti-monopoly-related provisions in the platform economy.

(3) To improve the “safe harbour” mechanism for monopoly agreements.

(4) To improve the investigation and handling procedures for the concentration of business operators that do not reach the declaration threshold.

(5) To set out specific requirements for the review of the concentration of business operators.

 

 

Cover Photo by Andreas Felske on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)