China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Amends Rules on Prohibiting Monopoly Agreements

Mon, 22 May 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 Mar. 2023, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) issued the amended Provisions on Prohibiting Monopoly Agreements (hereinafter the “Provisions”, 禁止垄断协议规定).

This amendment comes only one year after China amended the Provisions in March 2022.

According to the Provisions, “monopoly agreement” means an agreement, a decision, or any other act in concert to exclude or restrict competition.

The amendment mainly regulates the monopoly of Internet platforms. Among others, the following new elements are noteworthy.

  • Competitive operators shall not use data, algorithms, technologies, platform rules, etc., to communicate with each other, exchange sensitive information, and coordinate behaviors, since it constitutes a monopoly agreement.
  • Operators shall not use data, algorithms, technologies, platform rules, etc., to unify, restrict, or automatically set commodity prices, since it also constitutes a monopoly agreement.
  • Operators who proactively report to anti-monopoly law enforcement institutions about the monopoly agreement and offer important evidence may apply for mitigation of or exemption from punishment according to the law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Lin Lone on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)