China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Amends Rules on Prohibiting Monopoly Agreements

Mon, 22 May 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 Mar. 2023, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) issued the amended Provisions on Prohibiting Monopoly Agreements (hereinafter the “Provisions”, 禁止垄断协议规定).

This amendment comes only one year after China amended the Provisions in March 2022.

According to the Provisions, “monopoly agreement” means an agreement, a decision, or any other act in concert to exclude or restrict competition.

The amendment mainly regulates the monopoly of Internet platforms. Among others, the following new elements are noteworthy.

  • Competitive operators shall not use data, algorithms, technologies, platform rules, etc., to communicate with each other, exchange sensitive information, and coordinate behaviors, since it constitutes a monopoly agreement.
  • Operators shall not use data, algorithms, technologies, platform rules, etc., to unify, restrict, or automatically set commodity prices, since it also constitutes a monopoly agreement.
  • Operators who proactively report to anti-monopoly law enforcement institutions about the monopoly agreement and offer important evidence may apply for mitigation of or exemption from punishment according to the law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Lin Lone on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.