China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Drafts Measures on Administrative Penalties for Ecological Environment

Mon, 12 Sep 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 4 Aug. 2022, China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment issued the draft “Measures on Administrative Penalties for Ecological Environment” (生态环境行政处罚办法(征求意见稿), hereinafter the “Measures”) for public opinions through 5 Sept. 2022.

The Measures was promulgated to implement the newly revised Administrative Penalty Law.

China’s Administrative Penalty Law was revised on 22 Jan. 2021 and entered into force on 15 July 2021. Accordingly, the Measures has adjusted the provisions on the types of penalties, time limits for penalties, authorities of administrative organs, and procedures and enforcement of penalties.

Article 9 of the Measures adds new types of administrative penalties, including
(1) disciplinary warning;
(2) lowering the offender’s qualification level or revoking its license;
(3) prohibiting the offender from applying for administrative permits within a certain period;
(4) restricting the offender’s production or business operation;
(5) ordering the offender to suspend production for rectification;
(6) restricting the offender from engaging in specific occupations or industries;
(7) prohibiting the offender from engaging in specific occupations or industries; and
(8) ordering the offender to dismantle facilities within a prescribed time limit.

The Measures also adds provisions on the disclosure of administrative penalty decisions, as well as the conditions for mitigating, aggravating, and rescinding penalties. For instance, Article 44 stipulates that administrative penalties can be rescinded for those who violate the law for the first time or have no mens rea.

 

 

Cover Photo by Bournes senruoB on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.