China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Establishes Third Financial Court

Mon, 01 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 28 Feb. 2022, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress issued a decision to establish the Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court.

The Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court is China’s third specialized financial court, following those established in Shanghai in 2018 and Beijing in 2021.

The new court makes a breakthrough in traditional territorial jurisdiction by establishing cross-provincial jurisdiction, i.e., jurisdiction over financial cases from the designated area of Sichuan Province and that of Chongqing Municipality, which falls within the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle (“Twin City Circle”). In contrast, the Shanghai Financial Court and the Beijing Financial Court only have jurisdiction over local financial cases.

Specifically, the Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court will exercise exclusive jurisdiction over the following cases:

1. the cases from the Twin City Circle that should be under the jurisdiction of intermediate people’s courts, including:

(1) first-instance finance-related civil and commercial cases ;

(2) first-instance financial-related administrative cases with financial regulators as defendants; and

(3) first-instance finance-related civil, commercial, or administrative cases with financial infrastructure institutions as defendants or third parties and related to the performance of their duties;

2. cases of appeals or procuratorial protests from, or retrials of, the verdicts or judgments of primary people’s courts in the Twin City Circle in first-instance civil and commercial cases on finance as well as finance-related administrative cases;

3. cases that it should enforce; and

4. other financial cases designated by the Supreme People’s Court to be within its jurisdiction.

Sichuan and Chongqing are the economic and financial centers of southwest China. Until now, China has established specialized financial courts in the east (Shanghai), north (Beijing), and west (Chengdu and Chongqing) separately.

We speculate that the government’s next step is to establish a financial court in southern China’s financial hub; for instance, a financial court in Guangdong Province (Shenzhen or Guangzhou) with jurisdiction over the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.

 

 

Cover Photo by Shu Qian on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Tourism Disputes

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical tourism dispute cases, including health rights disputes caused by wild monkey attacks in Mount Emei, to guide courts in resolving common tourism conflicts and safeguarding tourists' legitimate rights and interests.

China Regulates Network Data Security

China's newly adopted “Regulation on Network Data Security Management”, effective January 1, 2025, seeks to standardize data processing, strengthen personal information protection, and tackle issues such as data security, risk assessments, and personalized profiling.

Beijing & Shanghai Unveil Low-Altitude Economy Plans

Beijing and Shanghai have announced plans to develop the low-altitude economy, aiming to grow the industry to CNY 100 billion and CNY 50 billion respectively by 2027, with a focus on aerial rescue, logistics, and passenger transport.

SPC Releases Typical Antitrust Cases

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) published eight typical cases on antitrust and unfair competition, highlighting issues like price-fixing, market dominance abuse, and deceptive practices.