China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Code of Ethics for New-Generation AI

Mon, 01 Nov 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 Sept. 2021, the National Special Committee of New-generation Artificial Intelligence Governance issued the “Code of Ethics for New-generation Artificial Intelligence” (hereinafter “the Code of Ethics”, 新一代人工智能伦理规范), aiming to integrate ethics and morals into the whole life cycle of AI and provide ethical guidance for stakeholders engaged in AI-related activities.

The Code of Ethics clearly states that various AI-related activities shall comply with six fundamental ethical norms, including promoting human well-being, improving fairness and impartiality, protecting privacy and security, ensuring controllability and credibility, intensifying the assumption of responsibilities, and enhancing ethical cultivation.

Certain AI activities shall observe 18 ethical requirements, which cover management norms, research and development norms, supply norms, and use norms.

Management norms include promoting agile governance, active practice demonstration, correct exercise and use of rights, strengthening risk prevention, and promoting inclusiveness and openness.

Research and development norms include strengthening the awareness of self-discipline, improving data quality, enhancing security and transparency, and avoiding bias and discrimination.

Supply norms include respecting market rules, improving quality control, safeguarding users' rights and interests, and strengthening emergency guarantees.

Use norms include advocating use in good faith, avoiding misuse or abuse, prohibiting illegal and malicious use, giving timely and active feedback, and boosting the useability.

 

 

Cover Photo by Xu Haiwei (https://unsplash.com/@mrsunburnt) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.