China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Regulates Internet Unfair Competition

Tue, 06 Aug 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 11 May 2024, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation issued the “Interim Provisions on Anti-Unfair Competition on the Internet” (网络反不正当竞争暂行规定, hereinafter referred to as the “Interim Provisions”), which will come into force on 1 Sept. 2024.

The Interim Provisions, focusing on unfair competition in the digital platform economy (including new issues such as fabricated reviews and illegal data scarping), aims to encourage innovation, regulate competition, protect the legitimate rights and interests of operators and consumers, and promote sustainable development of the digital economy.

The Interim Provisions comprises 43 articles in 5 chapters: General Provisions, Acts of Unfair Competition in the Internet Industry, Supervision and Inspection, Legal Liabilities, and Supplementary Provisions.

The highlights of the Interim Provisions are as follows:

  • Operators shall not use technical means (e.g. the Internet, big data, and algorithms) to interfere with users’ choices or otherwise, thereby impeding or sabotaging the normal operation of any online product or service lawfully provided by other operators. Specifically, operators shall not take any of the following actions:

(a) inserting a link or forcing a URL redirection in other operators’ internet products or services without their consent;

(b) misleading, tricking or forcing users to modify, shut down, or uninstall other operators’ internet products or services; or

(c) maliciously causing incompatibility with other operators’ internet products or services.

  • Operators shall not induce users into making certain favorable comments by means of cash rebates or rewards, nor shall operators make false or misleading commercial advertisements about the producers, operators, sales, transaction information, business data, user evaluations, etc. of the commodities in order to deceive or mislead consumers or the relevant public.
  • The dominant platform operator shall not, without justifiable reasons, utilize technical means to abuse management rules and information advantages such as back-end transaction data and Specifically, the dominant platform operator shall not block third-party business information or improperly interfere with the order of commodity display, thereby impeding or sabotaging the normal operation of any online product or service lawfully provided by other operators and disturbing the order of fair competition in the market.

 

 

Photo by Yu S on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.