China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Regulates Major Money Market Funds

Tue, 08 Aug 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 17 Feb. 2023, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and the People’s Bank of China jointly issued the “Interim Provisions on the Regulation of Major Money Market Funds” (hereinafter the Regulation, 重要货币市场基金监管暂行规定).

In recent years, China’s public fund industry has seen rapid development, with its total assets exceeding 27 trillion yuan and the number of investors surpassing 700 million.

As an inclusive financial product for cash management, money market funds have become indispensiable in the public fund industry due to their high security    , good liquidity, and low investment cost.

At the same time, some money market funds have grown significantly in size or involved a large number of investors, which will adversely affect the financial market if risks occur.

Accordingly, Chinese regulatory authorities have issued the Regulation mentioned above, which proposes more stringent and prudent regulatory requirements for such money market funds.

 

 

Photo by thom masat on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)