China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Typical Cases on Securities Crimes

Mon, 17 Oct 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 9 Sept. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission jointly released typical cases on securities crimes.

A total of five cases were included in this batch, which involved offences of illegal disclosure and non-disclosure of important information, transactions based on non-public information, illegal insider trading, leakage of insider information, and the betrayal of listed companies which damaged the company’s interests.

These cases, covering the common and frequent crimes in China’s capital markets as well as new crimes emerging in recent years, address the most typical issues, including:

1. to determine whether the defendants failed to comply with the obligation of information disclosure;

2. to determine whether the practitioners of private equity funds are accomplices in the crime of transactions based on non-public information; and

3. to distinguish between the crime of joint insider trading and the crime of leaking insider information.

According to the relevant data, from 2021 to June 2022, Chinese procuratorates across the country had prosecuted 376 people for various types of securities crimes and handled an array of cases involving financial fraud, market manipulation, insider trading, and other priority areas.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jeremy Cai on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)