China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Typical Cases on Securities Crimes

Mon, 17 Oct 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 9 Sept. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission jointly released typical cases on securities crimes.

A total of five cases were included in this batch, which involved offences of illegal disclosure and non-disclosure of important information, transactions based on non-public information, illegal insider trading, leakage of insider information, and the betrayal of listed companies which damaged the company’s interests.

These cases, covering the common and frequent crimes in China’s capital markets as well as new crimes emerging in recent years, address the most typical issues, including:

1. to determine whether the defendants failed to comply with the obligation of information disclosure;

2. to determine whether the practitioners of private equity funds are accomplices in the crime of transactions based on non-public information; and

3. to distinguish between the crime of joint insider trading and the crime of leaking insider information.

According to the relevant data, from 2021 to June 2022, Chinese procuratorates across the country had prosecuted 376 people for various types of securities crimes and handled an array of cases involving financial fraud, market manipulation, insider trading, and other priority areas.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jeremy Cai on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.