China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Revises Trade Union Law to Protect Gig Workers

Mon, 14 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Dec. 2021, the Standing Committee of China’s 13th National People’s Congress adopted a decision on revising the Trade Union Law of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国工会法) at its 32nd meeting and the newly-revised Trade Union Law came into effect on 1 Jan. 2022.

The current Trade Union Law was promulgated in 1992 and went through two revisions in 2001 and 2009.

The latest revision has added a clause to Article 3, stating that “trade unions adapt to the development and changes of enterprise organization forms, workforce structure, labor relations, employment forms, etc., and safeguard worker’s rights to join and organize trade unions in accordance with the law”.

It’s generally believed that this clause is to provide a legal basis for couriers, online ride-hailing drivers, food delivery workers, and other gig workers to organize and join the trade union.

Under current policy, China does not define gig economy workers as employees of an employer. See our article "Ride-hailing Drivers in China: Not Employees, But Independent Contractors".

However, traditionally in China, only employees of an employer can join and organize a trade union, which deprives gig economy workers of such right.

The newly revised Trade Union Law breaks with this tradition. It will enable 84 million gig economy workers in China to become trade union members.

 

 

Cover Photo by vigor poodo on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.