China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Landmark Shareholder Derivative Action: Chinese Investor Protection Centre Secures $ 48.6 Million

Wed, 07 Jun 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 2 Mar. 2023, through a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Shanghai Financial Court, China Securities Investor Service Centre Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the “Investor Protection Centre”) successfully compelled the executives of Shanghai DZH Limited (hereinafter the “DZH”), a listed company, to pay CNY 335 million (approx. USD 48.6 million) in compensation to DZH.

The Investor Protection Centre is an investor protection agency established by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC).

DZH was punished by CSRC in 2016 due to misrepresentation. Since then, thousands of investors have filed claims against DZH and its executives. As of 16 Feb. 2023, DZH has paid investors a total of CNY 335 million in compensation in accordance with the court judgments.

On 3 Apr. 2021, the Investor Protection Centre sent a letter to DZH, advising DZH to recover the compensation from its executives, but DZH did not take action.

On 8 Sept. 2021, the Investor Protection Centre, as a shareholder, initiated a shareholders’ derivative litigation on behalf of DZH against its executives before the Shanghai Financial Court, requesting them to indemnify DZH for the loss of CNY 335 million (hereinafter the “Investor Protection Centre Case”).

Two months later, DZH itself also sued the executives in the Shanghai Financial Court for such loss (hereinafter the “DZH Case”).

Finally, in the DZH Case, its executives agreed to compensate DZH for that loss. Correspondingly, in the Investor Protection Centre Case, the Investor Protection Centre also agreed to withdraw the action.

 

 

Cover Photo by David Veksler on Unsplash

 

 

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)