China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Sets up “Panda Court”

Mon, 21 Aug 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

In a mountainous region of southwest China, where many wild animals, including pandas, live, China established the Giant Panda National Park in 2021, one of the first batches of national parks formally established in China.

To protect this natural park, the Sichuan Giant Panda National Park Ecological Court was officially established here in 2021 under the guidance and support of China’s Supreme People’s Court.

This court, which is a dispatched tribunal of the Chengdu Second Railway Transport Court in western China’s Sichuan Province, has jurisdiction over first-instance criminal, civil, and administrative cases about environment and resources and related restorative judicial enforcement cases in the Sichuan area of the Giant Panda National Park.

Sichuan Province is a major habitat for pandas. In addition to the abovementioned court, another “Panda Court” was established in Sichuan in 2020, called the Wolong Court of Giant Panda National Park, the first Giant Panda National Park court in China.

When the new court is established, it will focus on all cases in Sichuan’s Giant Panda National Parks.

 

 

Photo by Ningyu He on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)