China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Centralize Jurisdiction over International Cases, Starting from Hainan's Two Foreign-related Tribunals

Sat, 07 Mar 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

 

Hainan’s newly-established First and Second Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunals marks China’s first step towards a more centralized administration system on international cases.

Two tribunals were set up in Hainan, China’s southernmost province, to centrally hear foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province. It marks China’s first step towards a more centralized administration system on international cases.

The two tribunals set up in Hainan Province were respectively named the First Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunal (located at Haikou, the capital city of Hainan), and the Second Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Tribunal (located at Sanya, the most well-known seaside resort city in China).

It was the first time for China to try to centralize the foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province to certain tribunals. Previously, these cases were usually handled by competent courts at primary and intermediate levels.

Hainan took this approach in order to better hear foreign-related civil and commercial cases.

Generally, Chinese judges in most local courts have very rare chances to deal with foreign-related civil and commercial cases, and therefore lack the related professional capability. Concentrated in certain tribunals, the foreign-related civil and commercial cases in the whole province will be heard by more experienced judges. The Supreme People’s Court (SPC) believes that this practice will provide investors with more stable expectations. [1]

China has established the pilot free trade zone (port) in Hainan, and has made efforts to set up a better cross-border commercial dispute settlement mechanism there. The SPC has also drawn up a corresponding plan for this purpose. [2]The establishment of foreign-related civil and commercial tribunals is part of the plan.


[1] 《海南第一、第二涉外民商事法庭海口知识产权法庭揭牌成立》, http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-187641.html,

[2] 《最高人民法院关于为海南全面深化改革开放提供司法服务和保障的意见》, http://www.court.gov.cn/fabu-xiangqing-111631.html.

 

Photo by Agathè Yosefina(https://unsplash.com/@agathayosefina) on Unsplash

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Defines Rules for Calculating Trademark Infringement Gains

In October 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) jointly issued the “Measures for Calculating Illegal Business Revenue in Trademark Infringement Cases”, which provide detailed operational guidelines for trademark enforcement authorities to calculate illegal business revenue.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Tourism Disputes

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical tourism dispute cases, including health rights disputes caused by wild monkey attacks in Mount Emei, to guide courts in resolving common tourism conflicts and safeguarding tourists' legitimate rights and interests.

China Regulates Network Data Security

China's newly adopted “Regulation on Network Data Security Management”, effective January 1, 2025, seeks to standardize data processing, strengthen personal information protection, and tackle issues such as data security, risk assessments, and personalized profiling.

Beijing & Shanghai Unveil Low-Altitude Economy Plans

Beijing and Shanghai have announced plans to develop the low-altitude economy, aiming to grow the industry to CNY 100 billion and CNY 50 billion respectively by 2027, with a focus on aerial rescue, logistics, and passenger transport.

SPC Releases Typical Antitrust Cases

In September 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) published eight typical cases on antitrust and unfair competition, highlighting issues like price-fixing, market dominance abuse, and deceptive practices.