China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Regulate Securities Brokerage Business

Mon, 13 Mar 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The “Measures for the Administration of Securities Brokerage Business” (证券经济业务管理办法, hereinafter the “Measures”) issued by China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) came into effect on 28 Feb. 2023.

In China, the securities brokerage business is the traditional business of Chinese securities companies, which refers to the operational activities such as securities transactions marketing, opening accounts entrusted by investors, processing trading orders, and handling settlements.

Until now, China’s securities companies have 12 thousand branches with 355 thousand securities practitioners and 210 million clients. Meanwhile, these companies have become accustomed to expanding their business online.

The current situation entails some adaptive changes in the regulation of the securities brokerage business in China, which is the main reason behind the Measures issuance.

The following points are noteworthy in the Measures.

  • Securities companies engaged in the securities brokerage business may choose news media, Internet information platforms, and other third platforms for advertising. Any session of the securities brokerage business, such as soliciting investors and receiving trading orders, shall be completed independently by securities companies without third-party involvement, .
  • Securities companies shall be aware of the basic information of investors, including their asset status, investment experience, and risk preference.
  • Investors shall adopt real-name authentication when opening capital and securities accounts in securities companies.

 

 

Cover Photo by Zhaoyang Chai on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)