China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Standardize Algorithm Recommendation Service

Thu, 30 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 27 Aug. 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China released the “Administrative Provisions on Algorithm Recommendation of Internet Information Services (Draft for Public Comment) (hereinafter “the Provisions”, 互联网信息服务算法推荐管理规定), to gather public opinions until 26. Sept. 2021.

The term "algorithm recommendation technology" in the Provisions refers to the application of algorithm technologies such as generation and synthesis, personalized notification, sorting and selection, retrieval and filtering, scheduling, and decision-making to provide users with information.

The Provisions sets forth several obligations for algorithm service providers, including formulating and publishing algorithm recommendation-related service rules, strengthening the ecological management of algorithm recommendation service pages, establishing and improving the mechanism for human intervention and users' independent choice, and providing users with options not tailored to their characteristics or providing users with convenient options to close the algorithm recommendation service.

 

 

Cover Photo by Mèng Jiǎ(https://unsplash.com/@justin73) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.