China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Toughen Rules for Virtual Currency Supervision

Thu, 08 Jul 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 18 May 2021, the National Internet Finance Association of China, China Banking Association, and the Payment and Clearing Association of China jointly released the “Announcement on Preventing Speculative Risks in Virtual Currency Trading(the “Announcement”, 关于防范虚拟货币交易炒作风险的公告). Pursuant to the Announcement, the virtual currency is not a legal tender, but a specific virtual commodity, which is not issued by monetary authorities, not recognized by law as a means to settle any debt, has no mandatory acceptance or other attributes of currency, and thus shall not and can not be used as a legal tender in the market.

In accordance with the Announcement, members such as financial institutions and payment institutions shall practice with enhanced social responsibilities, and are prohibited from using any virtual currency for product or service pricing, underwriting any virtual currency-related insurance policy, or include any virtual currency in any insurance policy coverage, or directly or indirectly providing customers with any other service related to virtual currencies.

Subsequently, on May 21, the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council in a conference explicitly proposed to crackdown on Bitcoin mining and trading activities. This was the first time that the State Council put forward clear requirements for cracking down on bitcoin mining and trading activities.

 

 

Cover Photo by Kevin Gu (https://unsplash.com/@kevinkoo) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.