China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Says Virtual Currency Investing or Trading Not Protected by Law

Sat, 25 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 23 Aug. 2021, Shandong High People's Court published  Ma v. Liu et al. (2021) on its official Wechat account, as a typical case on the application of the PRC Civil Code. The court confirmed that citizens' investment and trading in virtual currencies is against Chinese laws and is not protected by law.

Jinan Intermediate People’s Court, Shandong, the second-instance court, in this case, held that Velas Coin is a kind of virtual currency similar to bitcoin. Pursuant to the notice and announcement issued by the People’s Bank of China and other relevant authorities, virtual currencies are not issued by the authority issuing legal currency, and, therefore, are not legal tender and compulsory currency in nature, and cannot and should not be circulated and used as legal currency in the market. Citizens' investments and transactions of virtual currencies are in violation of relevant laws. In this case, Ma entrusted Liu, Chang, and Li to help him to register a Velas Coin account and purchase Velas Coins, which constituted a type of entrustment contract. In accordance with Article 8 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, civil subjects shall not violate laws and public order, and good customs when engaging in civil activities. Although the contract is based on the true intention of all parties, the act of Ma entrusting Liu, Chang, and Li to help him buy Velas Coin is not protected by law in China, and such type of entrustment contract is not protected by law in China.

 

 

Cover Photo by billow926 (https://unsplash.com/@billow926) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.