China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Government to Regulate Deepfake Technology

Mon, 02 Jan 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 3 Nov. 2022, the Cyberspace Administration of China issued the “Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet-based Information Service” (互联网信息服务深度合成管理规定, hereinafter the “Provisions”), which will come into effect on 10 Jan. 2023.

The Provisions consists of 25 articles and applies to the application of deep synthesis technology to provide Internet-based information services within China.

Among others, the following points are noteworthy.

  • No organization or individual may use deep synthesis services to produce, copy, publish, or disseminate information prohibited by laws and administrative regulations.
  • No organization or individual may use deep synthesis services to engage in activities prohibited by laws and administrative regulations, such as those endangering national security and interests, damaging the national image, infringing on public interests, disrupting economic and social order, and infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of others.
  • The deep synthesis service providers and users shall not use deep synthesis services to produce, copy, publish or disseminate false news information.
  • Deep synthesis service users shall have their real identity information authenticated.
  • Deep synthesis service providers shall establish and improve a rumor-refuting mechanism. If it is found that deep synthesis services are used to produce, copy, publish, or spread false information, they shall take timely measures for refuting rumors, keeping relevant records, and reporting to the regulatory authorities.
  • If deep synthesis service providers and technical supporters provide tools to generate or edit biometric information on the face and human voice, they shall conduct safety assessments.

 

 

Cover Photo by Hat Trick on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)