China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Guangzhou Court Recognizes Foreign Divorce Judgment in 15 Days

Wed, 14 Aug 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

In January 2024, the Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court, Guangdong (hereinafter the “Court”), recognized a Finnish divorce judgment at the request of Zhang, applying the “Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents” (hereinafter the “Apostille Convention”) to review the formal requirements of the judgment.The Court issued its decision within 15 days from the filing of the application.

On 16 Jan. 2024, Zhang applied to the Court for recognition of a divorce judgment issued by the Helsinki District Court of Finland, and submitted the judgment and the corresponding apostille certificate.

Upon review, the Court found that the Finnish divorce judgment submitted by the applicant constituted a foreign public document. As the Apostille Convention came into effect in China on 7 Nov. 2023, and that Finland is also a contracting party, the convention shall be applicable in this case. Besides, Zhang had provided the apostille certificate issued by the competent Finnish authority according to the Apostille Convention, thereby authenticating the signatures and seals.

Since the divorce judgment indicated that there were no children or joint property to dealt with by the court, the judgment was legally binding and met the conditions for recognizing foreign divorce judgments under Chinese law, the Court ruled to recognize the Finnish divorce judgment.

 

 

Photo by Chastagner Thierry on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.