China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

MOJ Issues Guiding Cases on Arbitration

Mon, 31 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Dec. 2021, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) released three guiding cases on arbitration in three areas including tourism contract disputes, construction contract disputes and investment contract disputes, aiming to promote the advantages of arbitration in professional dispute resolution.

The MOJ is the competent authority to guide and supervise arbitration work nationwide, and its Public Legal Services Administration is specifically responsible for such work.

In recent years, the MOJ has supported arbitration institutions to set up professional arbitration work platforms for securities and futures, intellectual property rights, construction projects, etc., built a special arbitration platform for tourism complaint disputes, and established the connecting mechanism between tourism complaints mediation and arbitration.

This is the first time that the MOJ has made a clear stance on arbitration supervision and support by issuing guiding cases. Prior to this, China's Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate have often issued their opinions by releasing guiding cases.

 

 

Cover Photo by JuniperPhoton on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.