China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

New Developments in China’s Foreign-related Commercial and Maritime Trial Services

Wed, 09 Nov 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 27 Sept. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) held a press conference, introducing the foreign-related commercial and maritime trials conducted by Chinese courts in the past 10 years.

1. Report on data

From 2013 to June 2022, Chinese courts at all levels nationwide had concluded over 295,000 foreign-related civil, commercial and maritime cases of first instance.

The SPC has formulated 31 judicial interpretations and nine normative documents on foreign-related commercial and maritime trial, and issued 12 guiding cases and 137 typical cases.

During the epidemic, the SPC promulgated the “Guiding Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning Properly Handling Civil Cases Related to COVID-19 Epidemic in accordance with the Law (III)” (关于依法妥善审理涉新冠肺炎疫情民事案件若干问题的指导意见(三)), which focuses on the trial of foreign-related commercial and maritime cases seriously affected by the epidemic, and has been included in the Case Law on UNCITRAL Texts (CLOUT) Database.

Related Post:

2. Innovation in foreign-related trial mechanism

The SPC revised the judicial interpretation of the service of judicial documents in foreign-related civil and commercial cases, to further clarify the rules on and regulate foreign-related service. Also, the SPC has launched the national judicial assistance management platform and integrated it with the civil and commercial judicial assistance system of the Ministry of Justice.

Many Chinese courts have been exploring electronic service of process, service of process via litigants, lawyers, notary agencies, and overseas Chinese groups, without violation of the laws of the country concerned.

In addition, the SPC has gathered five agencies for proof of foreign law and international commercial expert committee members to establish a unified platform for proof of foreign law and a resource library of foreign laws and cases.

3. Maritime court system

China has established the Nanjing Maritime Court, forming a national maritime trial system comprising 11 maritime courts and 42 dispatched tribunals.

4. Innovation in international commercial dispute resolution mechanism

China has set up the First and Second International Commercial Courts in Shenzhen and Xi’an respectively. So far, 27 cases have been accepted by these two courts, with 11 concluded.

As the portal to display developments in China International Commercial Court (CICC) and to provide online litigation services, CICC’s website has gained widespread attention, with total visits exceeding 4.01 million, covering 149 countries and regions worldwide.

 

 

Cover Photo by 炫铭 on Unsplash

 

 

Contributors: China Laws Portal Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.