China Justice Observer

中国司法观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)DutchFrenchGermanItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Practices and Development of China International Commercial Court (CICC)

Sat, 10 Jul 2021
Categories: China Legal News

On 18 May 2021, the High-end Round-table Conference on International Commercial Legal Services and the Symposium on Safeguarding International Commercial Legal Services for the Post-Epidemic Era under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was held in Xi'an. Gao Xiaoli (高晓力), the First Deputy Director of the 6th Circuit Court of the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and Judge of China International Commercial Court (CICC), introduced the practices and development of CICC at the conference.

CICC was established in 2018, The First International Commercial Court was established in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, and the Second International Commercial Court was established in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province.

In terms of adjudicating foreign-related commercial cases, there are differences between CICC and other Chinese courts:

  • CICC, as the permanent adjudication organ established by the SPC, closes cases after the first-instance trial.
  • The minority opinions on the adjudication may be expressly stated in the judicial instruments.
  • If the evidentiary materials submitted by the parties are in English, they don’t have to submit a Chinese translation after obtaining the consent of the other party.
  • For investigating, collecting evidence, and organizing cross-examination, audio transmission technology, and other information network methods may be adopted.
  • It is allowed to register a case, pay the bills, read the materials, exchange the evidence, serve the court instruments, and attend the hearing, etc via the Internet.
  • The parties may apply to CICC for enforcement of the binding judgments, rulings, and mediation statements which it renders.
  • For judgments, rulings, and mediation statements that have become legally binding, the parties may apply to the SPC for retrial.

In accordance with the statistics, as of May 2021, CICC has accepted 18 international commercial cases involving parties from the United States, Japan, Italy, the Philippines, Thailand, the British Virgin Islands, and other countries/ regions, and has concluded eight cases.

At the same time, CICC adheres to the principle of diversified dispute resolution and creates a “one-stop” international commercial dispute resolution mechanism integrating litigation, arbitration and mediation. Among the eight cases already concluded, five cases involve arbitration.

 

 

Cover Photo by 花茶 利酒 (https://unsplash.com/@scentedtea_wine) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China to Strengthen the Cybersecurity of Intelligent Connected Vehicles

In June 2021, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued the proposed “Notice on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Telematics (Intelligent Networked Vehicles) (Draft for Public Comment) (关于加强车联网(智能网联汽车)网络安全工作的通知(征求意见稿)), aiming to regulate the development, utilization and sharing of data, and to strengthen the security management of data transmitted abroad.

China to Promote Diversified Settlement of Tourism Disputes

In June 2021, China's Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the “Notice on Carrying out the Pilot Work of Connecting Mediation and Arbitration of Tourism Complaints” (关于开展旅游投诉调解与仲裁衔接试点工作的通知), proposing the establishment, on a pilot basis, of special arbitration platforms for tourism complaints and encouraging the settlement of tourism disputes through mediation.

NHSA Seeks Comments on Medical Security Law

In June 2021, China's National Healthcare Security Administration released the “Medical Security Law (Draft for Public Comment)” (医疗保障法(征求意见稿)) for public comment.

SPC Revises Provisions on Judicial Interpretation

In June 2021, the "Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Revising the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Judicial Interpretation" (最高人民法院关于修改〈最高人民法院关于司法解释工作的规定〉的决定) came into force, which incorporates “Rules” (规则) as the fifth type of judicial interpretations.