China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Issues White Paper and Typical Cases on Proof of Foreign Law

Mon, 24 Oct 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 13 Sept. 2022, Shanghai High People’s Court held a press conference to issue the Chinese-English bilingual version of “White Paper on Proof of Foreign Law in Foreign-related Commercial Trials in Shanghai (2015-2021) ” (hereinafter “the White Paper”, 上海涉外商事审判域外法查明白皮书(2015-2021)) and typical relevant cases for the first time.

In a foreign-related civil or commercial case,[1] when the parties agree to apply certain foreign law or the applicable law is determined according to the conflict norms, the court needs to find out the content of the foreign law via some channels or in some means.

Whether the foreign law can be determined and correctly applied will affect the affirmation of the substantive rights and obligations of the parties and the outcome.

The White Paper summarizes the features that have been identified in the foreign-related commercial trials subject to proof of foreign law in Shanghai courts since 2015.

1. Methods of proof

According to the White Paper, the channels for proof of foreign law in foreign-related commercial cases heard in Shanghai courts since 2015 include proof by parties directly, proof by experts entrusted by litigants, proof by experts entrusted by courts, and proof by judges directly.

In the practice, the judge may determine the foreign law by searching the Internet during a court session, and the litigants may also provide foreign law based on academic publications or the foreign judgments that have come into force.

2. Demand for proof

Litigants’ demands for proof of foreign law can be various. According to a sampling analysis in the White Paper, the proof of statutory law accounts for 68.10%, precedents for 25.23%, the burden of litigation costs, arbitration and other procedural matters for 4.7%, and international treaties and practices for 1.97%.

3. Role of experts and institutions

When there are discrepancies in understanding the foreign laws between the litigants, the legal opinions issued by proof of foreign law experts as entrusted by the court is an additional means to the proof of foreign law.

As of 2021, the Center of Proof of Foreign Law at East China University of Political Science and Law had accepted over 20 requests for proof of foreign law by Shanghai courts.

At the press conference, the Shanghai High People’s Court also released nine typical cases on the proof and application of foreign laws involving the United States, Singapore, Switzerland, Japan, and Hong Kong SAR in foreign-related commercial trials in recent years.

 

[1] Unless otherwise specified, the term “foreign-related cases/disputes” also includes those relating to Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.

 

 

Cover Photo by Bide Cui on Unsplash

Contributors: China Laws Portal Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises National Defense Education Law

In September 2024, the newly revised “National Defense Education Law of the People’s Republic of China” was passed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee and came into effect on 21 September.

SPC Releases Typical Cases to Support Hong Kong Arbitration

In September 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released six typical cases to demonstrate its support for Hong Kong arbitration, emphasizing judicial cooperation and the recognition of arbitral awards to foster international arbitration development.

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

In August 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation that addresses punitive damages in food safety cases, featuring typical cases to establish uniform standards and enhance consumer protection.

Authenticating Documents for Use in Chinese Courts: Apostille or Not?

The 1961 Apostille Convention, effective in China as of November 2023, simplifies the authentication of foreign documents for use in Chinese courts by replacing traditional consular legalization with apostille. Note that authentication is only required for certain types of documents under Chinese law, and the apostille process applies only when the 1961 Convention is relevant.

SPP Releases 2024 Mid-Year Case Data

In the first half of 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) reported significant increases in arrests and prosecutions, as well as a notable rise in retrials based on their recommendations in civil cases.

China Intensifies Crackdown on Cross-Border Telecom Fraud

In July 2024, China's Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), Supreme People’s Court (SPC), and the Ministry of Public Security released ten typical cases to highlight their intensified efforts to combat cross-border telecom and online fraud, emphasizing organized crime and emerging technologies.

China's Clean Energy Progress Report (2024)

China's 2024 white paper titled “China’s Energy Transition” shows clean energy now makes up 58.2% of installed power capacity, with wind and solar increasing tenfold over a decade, and clean energy consumption rising from 15.5% to 26.4% of total energy use.