China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Releases White Paper on Foreign-related Commercial Trials

Mon, 24 Oct 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 13 Sept. 2022, the Shanghai High People’s Court issued the Chinese-English bilingual version of “Shanghai High People’s Court White Paper on Foreign-related[1] Commercial Trials (2017-2021)” (hereinafter the “White Paper”, 上海市高级人民法院涉外、涉港澳台商事审判白皮书(2017-2021)).

According to the White Paper,

  1. Between 2017 and 2021, Shanghai courts accepted 4,202 first and second-instance foreign-related commercial cases, and closed 4,294, with the total amount of controversy reaching over CNY 92 billion (approx. USD 13 billion).
  2. The cases were mainly resolved by litigation, but mediation had also been widely adopted, showing the effect of the diverse dispute resolution mechanism.
  3. The top three types in terms of numbers were disputes in lending, sales and equity transfer, making up 40.33%. Other common disputes included service contract, partnership contract, and damage to corporate interests.
  4. In addition to cases involving Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, there were 2,989 foreign-related commercial cases, which involved 76 countries and regions.

The White Paper also includes a number of typical cases with international and domestic influence. For example, the Daesung Industrial Gases Co., Ltd. vs. Praxair (China) Investment Co., Ltd. over the validity of the arbitration agreement, in which the parties agreed to be arbitrated by a foreign arbitration institution in Shanghai, is the first case accepted and concluded in Shanghai.

 

[1] Unless otherwise specified, the term “foreign-related cases/disputes” also includes those relating to Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.

 

 

Cover Photo by Bide Cui on Unsplash

 

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.

China MOJ Boosts World-Class Arbitration Institutions

In 2025, China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ) launched an initiative to cultivate leading international arbitration institutions with Chinese characteristics, selecting 22 for the first batch amid growing global recognition of Chinese arbitration hubs.