China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Releases White Paper on Foreign-related Commercial Trials

Mon, 24 Oct 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 13 Sept. 2022, the Shanghai High People’s Court issued the Chinese-English bilingual version of “Shanghai High People’s Court White Paper on Foreign-related[1] Commercial Trials (2017-2021)” (hereinafter the “White Paper”, 上海市高级人民法院涉外、涉港澳台商事审判白皮书(2017-2021)).

According to the White Paper,

  1. Between 2017 and 2021, Shanghai courts accepted 4,202 first and second-instance foreign-related commercial cases, and closed 4,294, with the total amount of controversy reaching over CNY 92 billion (approx. USD 13 billion).
  2. The cases were mainly resolved by litigation, but mediation had also been widely adopted, showing the effect of the diverse dispute resolution mechanism.
  3. The top three types in terms of numbers were disputes in lending, sales and equity transfer, making up 40.33%. Other common disputes included service contract, partnership contract, and damage to corporate interests.
  4. In addition to cases involving Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, there were 2,989 foreign-related commercial cases, which involved 76 countries and regions.

The White Paper also includes a number of typical cases with international and domestic influence. For example, the Daesung Industrial Gases Co., Ltd. vs. Praxair (China) Investment Co., Ltd. over the validity of the arbitration agreement, in which the parties agreed to be arbitrated by a foreign arbitration institution in Shanghai, is the first case accepted and concluded in Shanghai.

 

[1] Unless otherwise specified, the term “foreign-related cases/disputes” also includes those relating to Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.

 

 

Cover Photo by Bide Cui on Unsplash

 

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.