China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC & SPP Release Typical Cases of Administrative Public Interest Litigation (2024)

Thu, 20 Mar 2025
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Dec. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) jointly released the second batch of typical cases of administrative public interest litigation.

This batch consists of seven cases covering various areas, including workplace safety, state-owned property protection, food safety, cultural heritage protection, accessible environment construction, protection of minors, and personal information protection.

For example, Case 6 concerns the protection of minors and involves a public interest litigation filed by the local procuratorate in Anhui Province against the local Culture and Tourism Bureau for failing to perform its duties in regulating entertainment venues. The case addresses, among other things, the administrative failure to regulate bars and other entertainment venues in the jurisdiction that unlawfully admitted minors and failed to prominently display signs prohibiting or restricting access by minors. Initially, the local procuratorate issued a prosecutorial proposal and later filed an administrative public interest lawsuit.

After a public hearing, the court ruled to terminate the litigation because the administrative authority had taken measures to fulfill its regulatory duties. Additionally, the court issued a judicial proposal requiring the administrative agency to establish a regulatory mechanism to protect the legal rights of minors.

According to the SPC, from 1 July 2023 to 30 Nov. 2024, Chinese courts at all levels nationwide concluded 1,026 first-instance administrative public interest litigation cases in fields other than environmental and resource cases, an increase of 51.8% year-on-year. Among these cases, those in the fields of state-owned property protection and assignment of state-owned land use rights accounted for a large portion, making up 30.2% and 18.31%, respectively. Cases in the fields of food and drug safety, protection of heroes and martyrs’ rights, and protection of minors accounted for a moderate share, while cases in other fields, such as cultural heritage protection, protection of women’s rights, and anti-monopoly law were fewer.

 

 

Photo by Rafik Wahba on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.