China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Encourages Environmental Experts to Serve as People’s Assessors in Environmental Resource Cases

Mon, 16 Oct 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The “Several Provisions on the Participation of People’s Assessors with Expertise in the Trial of Cases involving Environmental Resource” (关于具有专门知识的人民陪审员参加环境资源案件审理的若干规定, hereinafter the “Provisions”), newly issued by China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), came into effect on 1 Aug. 2023.

The highlights of the Provisions are as follows.

  • Where the facts of environmental resource cases involve complicated specialized issues, at least one people’s assessor with expertise shall participate in the trial by the collegial panel.
  • People’s assessors with expertise include (i) people with expertise in the field of environmental resources and (ii) people who have worked for three or more years in the relevant administrative departments of environmental resources, scientific research institutions, institutions of higher learning, enterprises, and social organizations.
  • When people’s assessors with expertise participate in the deliberation of environmental resource cases, they shall give explicit opinions on specialized issues involved in the facts of the case.
  • If the opinions given by people’s assessors with expertise on the specialized issues are inconsistent with those of other members of the collegial panel, the collegial panel may submit the case to the president of the court to decide whether to submit it to the adjudication committee for discussion and decision-making. Relevant circumstances shall be recorded in the munites of the deliberations.

 

 

Photo by Noppon Meenuch on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)