China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Further Regulates Similar Case Retrieval System

Wed, 05 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Nov. 2021, China’s Supreme People’s Court(SPC) issued the “Implementing Measures of the Supreme People’s Court for Unifying the Application of Law” (hereinafter “the Measures”, 最高人民法院统一法律适用工作实施办法).

The Measures has expanded the application of similar cases retrieval system.

Before that, on 1 June 2020, the SPC published the “Guiding Opinions on Unifying the Application of Laws and Strengthening Similar Case Retrieval (for Trial Implementation)” (“the Guiding Opinions”) (关于统一法律适用加强类案检索的指导意见(试行)), which refines the Similar Case Retrieving System based on the previous explorations of some courts across the country. (See “When Should Chinese Judges Retrieve Similar Cases?”.)

When hearing cases, the SPC further extended the scope for cases that should be subject to similar case retrieval, in addition to the case categories stipulated in the Guiding Opinions.

Similar discussions can be found in our previous posts.

Some may wonder why China establishes the similar case retrieval system. The main purposes lie in the need to promote uniformity in the application of law and the need to promote supervision over judges. (See “Why China Establishes Guiding Case System and Similar Case Retrieval System?”.)

Others may have questions like: Does China have case law? The answer is No. Chinese judges only apply statutory law. However, the SPC is trying to establish a certain degree of "case law". (See “Does China have Case Law?”.)

For more information about the Similar Case Retrieval System, please refer to our previous article on “Similar Judgements for Similar Cases”.

 

 

Cover Photo by billow926 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.