China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Highlights Environmental Case Surge in Report to NPC, Emphasizes Global Collaboration

Tue, 19 Dec 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Oct. 2023, Justice Zhang Jun, the President of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), submitted the “SPC’s Report on Environmental and Resources Trial Work of the People’s Courts” (hereinafter the “Report”, 最高人民法院关于人民法院环境资源审判工作情况的报告) to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC).

According to the Report:

  • From January 2018 to September 2023, all courts in China concluded a total of 1.47 million first-instance cases of various types related to environmental and resources issues. Among them, there were 186,000 criminal cases, 983,000 civil cases, 278,000 administrative cases, and 23,000 environmental public interest litigation cases filed by various entities. The number of first-instance environmental and resource cases accepted from 2018 to 2022 increased by 76.7 percent compared to the previous five years.
  • In June 2014, the SPC established the Environment and Resources Division to handle related cases and supervise and guide the environmental and resources adjudication in courts nationwide. As of now, courts at all levels nationwide have separately established 2,813 specialized environmental and resource adjudication institutions.
  • In October 2021, the SPC, in cooperation with the United Nations Environment Programme, organized the World Judicial Conference on Environment and approved the “Kunming Declaration” (hereinafter the “Declaration”, 昆明宣言). The Declaration clarified that environmental justice should adhere to three major legal principles: the principle of equity, common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, the principle of protection and sustainable use of natural resources, and the principle of liability for damage. It also advocated for the active application of four judicial measures: preventative and restorative judicial measures, public interest litigation, and diversified dispute resolution methods.

 

 

Photo by Shirley Xu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)