China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues New Rules on Personal Protection Orders

Tue, 23 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 15 July 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Cases on Personal Protection Orders” (关于办理人身安全保护令案件适用法律若干问题的规定, hereinafter referred to as the “Provisions”), which came into force on 1 Aug. 2022.

The Provisions details China’s regulations on the personal protection order (PPO), which are included in the 2016 Anti-Domestic Violence Law (反家庭暴力法).

The PPO mechanism was first established in the Anti-Domestic Violence Law. By 31 Dec. 2021, Chinese courts had issued 10,917 PPOs. The SPC promulgated the Provisions to develop standard norms for the courts to issue PPOs.

According to the Provisions, interested parties can apply to the people’s courts for PPOs when:

(1) The party is suffering from or threatened by “domestic violence” (as defined by Article 2 of the Anti-Domestic Violence Law); or

(2) The party is mentally or physically tortured by family members, such as being deprived of food or clothing, or is frequently insulted, slandered, threatened, stalked, harassed, or otherwise (these behaviors shall also be deemed as “domestic violence”).

The court can issue a PPO to implement the following measures:

(1) prohibiting the respondent from committing domestic violence;

(2) prohibiting the respondent from harassing, stalking, or contacting the applicant and their close relatives;

(3) compelling the respondent to move out of the applicant’s domicile;

(4) prohibiting the respondent from insulting, slandering, or threatening the applicant and their close relatives by any means of communication; and

(5) prohibiting the respondent from engaging in any activity that may affect the applicant and their close relatives within a certain range of the places frequented by the applicant and their close relatives.

 

 

Cover Photo by Elijah Chen on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)