China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Issues Online Litigation Rules for People's Courts

Sat, 24 Jul 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 17 June 2021, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the Online Litigation Rules for People's Courts (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules", 人民法院在线诉讼规则) to further standardize the litigation process in the form of judicial interpretations, such as online case filing, mediation, inquiry, evidence exchange, court hearing, judgment rendering, and enforcement, etc.

The Rules consists of 39 articles, covering the legal effect of online litigation, basic principles, the scope of application, as well as the online procedural rules for major proceedings, such as case filing and enforcement. Pursuant to the Rules, online litigation may be handled online throughout the whole process or in a specific phrase.

The Rules clarifies the standards on the use of electronic evidence and electronic service in online litigation.

In terms of the validity of electronic evidence, the Rules specifies that, to the extent that it is safe and reliable, the electronic evidence shall be deemed as originals and the examination and verification rules for electronic materials are clarified. The Rules expands the ways in which litigants submit litigation materials, and ensures the authenticity of electronic materials.

In terms of blockchain evidence, the Rules confirms the presumed untampered effectiveness of the data after being stored in the blockchain, and clarifies the examination standards for the authenticity of blockchain-stored evidence.

In terms of electronic service, the Rules, aiming at problem-solving, comprehensively stipulates the applicable conditions, the scope of content, means of electronic service, etc. On the basis of fully respecting the wills of the parties, the Rules strengthens the application of electronic service and gives full consideration to the accuracy and efficiency of service process.

 

 

Cover Photo by Grey Zhang (https://unsplash.com/@greyzhang) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.