China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases First Typical Cases on Administrative Agreements

Tue, 15 Jun 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 11 May 2021, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released typical cases on administrative agreements for the first time. There are ten cases in this batch, covering the application of law in matters relating to performance, alteration, termination and invalidation of administrative agreements, etc.

The highlights are summarized below.

Firstly, these cases reflect the diversity of administrative agreement cases, covering cases on conclusion, unilateral alteration or rescission of an administrative agreement by administrative organs, cases on failure by administrative organs to fulfill their obligations according to law or as agreed, cases on expropriation and compensation agreements, and cases on government franchise, investment, and fund-raising, etc.

Secondly, these cases demonstrate the unique features of hearing administrative agreement cases. When hearing administrative agreement cases, the people’s courts review not only the legality of administrative action in accordance with the Administrative Procedure law, but also the agreement itself and compliance with the contract terms.

Thirdly, these cases embody the particularity of the rules for hearing administrative agreement cases. For example, in terms of application of law, the applicable administrative regulations and the Administrative Procedure Law shall be applied with priority in administrative agreement cases, and civil laws and regulations such as the Civil Code can also be applied in the absence of applicable administrative regulations and the Administrative Procedure Law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jie (https://unsplash.com/@imjma) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.