China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases IP Guiding Cases

Thu, 25 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

On 7 Dec. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the 39th batch of guiding cases.

This batch consists of eight cases numbered 217 to 224, all involving intellectual property rights (IPR).

The details are as follows.

  • Guiding Case No. 217 involves disputes over IPR infringement on e-commerce platforms.
  • Guiding Case No. 218 involves how to determine the nature of registration of integrated circuit layout designs and the originality of the layout designs in question.
  • Guiding Case No. 219 involves determining whether acts of IPR infringement constitute serious circumstances and how to apply punitive damages.
  • Guiding Case No. 220 involves determining the amount of damages when all technical secrets are used and intentional infringement is established.
  • Guiding Case No. 221 clarifies that losses incurred by operators participating in horizontal monopoly agreements during the period of participation and performance of the agreement are not protected by law.
  • Guiding Case No. 222 specifies that the registered patentee shall abide by the principle of good faith and bear the obligation to act in good faith to maintain the validity of patent rights during disputes over patent ownership.
  • Guiding Case No. 223 involves the determination of the jurisdictional for civil disputes over infringement of the right to disseminate works through information networks.
  • Guiding Case No. 224 clarifies that in case of disputed copyright ownership, the ownership of works cannot be determined solely based on watermarks or rights statements.

 

Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.