China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases IP Guiding Cases

Thu, 25 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

On 7 Dec. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released the 39th batch of guiding cases.

This batch consists of eight cases numbered 217 to 224, all involving intellectual property rights (IPR).

The details are as follows.

  • Guiding Case No. 217 involves disputes over IPR infringement on e-commerce platforms.
  • Guiding Case No. 218 involves how to determine the nature of registration of integrated circuit layout designs and the originality of the layout designs in question.
  • Guiding Case No. 219 involves determining whether acts of IPR infringement constitute serious circumstances and how to apply punitive damages.
  • Guiding Case No. 220 involves determining the amount of damages when all technical secrets are used and intentional infringement is established.
  • Guiding Case No. 221 clarifies that losses incurred by operators participating in horizontal monopoly agreements during the period of participation and performance of the agreement are not protected by law.
  • Guiding Case No. 222 specifies that the registered patentee shall abide by the principle of good faith and bear the obligation to act in good faith to maintain the validity of patent rights during disputes over patent ownership.
  • Guiding Case No. 223 involves the determination of the jurisdictional for civil disputes over infringement of the right to disseminate works through information networks.
  • Guiding Case No. 224 clarifies that in case of disputed copyright ownership, the ownership of works cannot be determined solely based on watermarks or rights statements.

 

Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)