China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases New Policy on Blockchain Technology in Judicial Field

Mon, 04 Jul 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 May 2022, the Supreme People’s Court issued the “Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Strengthening Blockchain Application in the Judicial Field (最高人民法院关于加强区块链司法应用的意见, hereinafter referred to as the “Opinions”), laying out the future role of blockchain technology in the Chinese judicial system.

The overall objective of the Opinions is to build a blockchain alliance featuring interconnectivity and sharing between the people’s courts and all social sectors, and a relatively complete standard system for blockchain application in the judicial field by 2025.

The Opinions, containing 32 articles, is published in both Chinese and English, which manifests the SPC’s wish to introduce the policy to the world.

Here are four takeaways from the Opinions.

  1. China will establish a judicial blockchain platform connecting people’s courts nationwide, where parties can verify the authenticity of mediation data, electronic evidence, litigation documents, and other judicial data.
  2. Judicial data of people’s courts, such as electronic case files and electronic archives, are expected to be stored in the platform to make sure them to be tamper-proof.
  3. The platform will enable parties and judges to verify the electronic evidence stored on the blockchain.
  4. The platform will build an interoperation collaborative mechanism with other blockchain platforms for data concerning intellectual property, business registration, financial information, credit information, etc.

 

 

Cover Photo by JuniperPhoton on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.