China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Cultural Property Protection

Mon, 20 Mar 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 7 Feb. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released 15 typical cases involving cultural property.

The SPC released the cases jointly selected by the SPC and the National Cultural Heritage Administration of China4 to direct local courts in hearing cases involving cultural relics and guide cultural relics administrative departments in improving their law enforcement capacity.

This batch of cases involves the following types, such as:

  • Criminal cases related to crimes of stealing, destroying, and reselling cultural relics, as well as excavating and robbing sites of ancient culture and ancient tombs;
  • Civil cases related to torts of damaging cultural relics and historic reservations, as well as taking cultural relics into one’s possession;
  • Administrative litigation related to administrative malfeasance of government departments failing to perform the duty of protecting cultural relics;
  • Cases related to the law enforcement of cultural relics administration departments.

In Case 15, Xi’an Lintong District Culture, Tourism, and Sports Bureau, the cultural relics administrative department in charge of the Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor, requested a construction company to stop working near this historic site and imposed an administrative penalty against the company. This case exemplifies the Chinese government’s protection of this cultural relic.

The Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor, also known as the Terracotta Warriors (Terracotta Army), is on the UNESCO World Heritage List, and its Terracotta Army is a cultural heritage comparable to the pyramids of Egypt.

 

 

Cover Photo by Xiaolin Zhang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.