China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Sets Standards for Punitive Damages in Food Safety

Thu, 31 Oct 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Aug. 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases Involving Disputes over Punitive Damages for Food and Drugs” (关于审理食品药品惩罚性赔偿纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释, hereinafter the “Interpretation”), along with a series of typical cases on punitive damages for food safety violations with the aim of unifying judicial standards, protecting consumers’ rights and interests, and maintaining the order of production and operation.

The Interpretation consists of 19 articles, which clearly take “the extent of reasonable consumer needs” as the element in the assessment of punitive damages, and support the claims for punitive damages by consumers who knowingly purchase substandard products within this scope. The Interpretation also addresses issues such as the liability of intermediaries, small food production and processing workshops, and defects in labeling and instructions.

The highlights of the Interpretation are as follows:

  • Where a buyer knows that the food brought in does not meet food safety standards, and claims punitive damages of ten times the purchase price from the producer or distributor under the Food Safety Law, the court shall uphold the buyer’s claim in accordance with the law to the extent of reasonable consumer needs. The court may determine the amount of food that the buyer needs as a reasonable consumer based on factors such as shelf life and the ordinary consumption habits of an ordinary consumer.
  • If the producer or distributor alleges that the buyer knowingly purchased food that does not meet food safety standards, such producer or distributer shall provide evidence to support this allegation.

 

 

Photo by Federico Mata on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.