China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC to Unify Rules on Compulsory Enforcement of Equity

Mon, 31 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Dec. 2021, the Supreme People’s Court issued the “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Certain Issues Concerning the Compulsory Enforcement of Equity Interests by the People’s Courts” (hereinafter “the Provisions”, 最高人民法院关于人民法院强制执行股权若干问题的规定), which took effect on 1 Jan. 2022.

Consisting of 19 articles, the Provisions mainly regulates the following five aspects:

  1. The Provisions only applies to the equity in unlisted companies, including the shares listed and traded on a stock exchange.
  2. If the court freezes the shares of the judgment debtor, it should announce the information in the Credit Information Disclosure System for Enterprises Nationwide;
  3. The court may freeze the proceeds of dividends and bonuses deviant from the shares of the judgment debtor;
  4. When the judgment debtor wishes to sell the frozen shares, the consent of the applicant and other known enforcement creditors is required and the permission shall be granted by the court; and,
  5. The court can auction the shares of the judgment debtor and adopt the online judicial auction.

 

 

Cover Photo by David Veksler on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.