China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Publishes Guidelines on Handling IP Cases for Chinese Procuratorates

Mon, 26 Jun 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 Apr. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) released the “Guidelines on Handling Intellectual Property Cases for People’s Procuratorates” (hereinafter the “Guidelines”, 人民检察院办理知识产权案件工作指引).

The Guidelines is divided into three main sections, including (1) the handling of criminal intellectual property cases; (2) the handling of civil and administrative intellectual property litigation supervision cases; and (3) the handling of intellectual property public interest litigation cases.

The Guidelines also stipulates that the procuratorate may hold a hearing when handling an intellectual property case that involves relatively considerable disputes in fact-finding, application of law, case handling, or any other aspect, or that has significant social impact. As needed by the case, a person with expertise or a procuratorial technician may be invited to participate in the hearing. The hearing of an intellectual property case involving any trade secret may be held in private at the request of a party.

 

 

Cover Photo by jevens julian on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)