China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPP Releases Guiding Cases against Crimes Involving New Drugs

Tue, 02 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 June 2022, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) updated China’s combat against drug crimes at a press conference.

The following information disclosed in the press conference is noteworthy.

1. This is SPP’s 37th batch of guiding cases under the theme of “combat against crimes involving new drugs”.

New drugs, contrasted to conventional drugs, generally refer to drugs synthesized by chemical methods, namely drugs other than traditional opioids, marijuana, and cocaine. They include methamphetamine (i.e., “ice”) and state-controlled narcotic or psychotropic drugs.

In China, lawbreakers are increasingly inclined to manufacture, sell, and consume state-controlled narcotic or psychotropic drugs (i.e., “new psychoactive substances”) as drug substitutes.

2. From 2019 to March 2022, Chinese procuratorates prosecuted more than 160,000 people for crimes involving new drugs, including more than 150,000 people for methamphetamine and other drugs, and 18,000 for new psychoactive substances.

The number of drug crimes prosecuted by Chinese procuratorates decreased yearly, from 109,000 in 2019 to 75,000 in 2021. However, among these cases, the proportion of crimes involving new drugs increased rapidly, from 53% in 2019 to 57% in 2021.

Crimes involving synthetic cannabinoid drugs are also surging. Among the crimes involving new psychoactive substances, ketamine and phencyclidine take the highest proportion, accounting for 46% of the prosecutions.

 

 

 

Cover Photo by Andreas Felske on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)