China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Supreme Courts of China and Singapore Sign MOU on Foreign Law

Wed, 11 May 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 3 Apr. 2022, the Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation between the SPC and the Supreme Court of Singapore on Information on Foreign Law  (hereinafter referred to as the “MOU”) officially came into force.

This MOU is part of the SPC’s efforts to address a common problem faced by Chinese local courts – the insufficient capacity to ascertain foreign law.

In accordance with the MOU, if it is necessary for courts in the Republic of Singapore and the People's Republic of China to apply the law of the other State in adjudicating international civil and commercial cases, a request may be made to the Supreme Court in the other State to provide information and opinions on its domestic law and judicial practice in civil and commercial matters, or matters relating thereto.

The MOU specifies a timeline for the transmission of the requested information. It requires the Receiving Party to respond to the request for information and opinions as promptly as possible and to notify the Requesting Party in a timely manner if it is unable to respond within 60 days after receipt of the request.

The MOU also stipulates that if the Receiving Party considers that issuing a reply to the request may be prejudicial to its sovereignty, security, or public interests, it may refuse the request but will promptly notify the Requesting Party accordingly.

 

 

Cover Photo by Mike Enerio on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)