China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Tianjin Bans the Collection of Facial Recognition Data - China Legal News

Sat, 09 Jan 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In Dec. 2020, Tianjing enacted the Regulation of Social Credit of Tianjin Municipality, which will come into force as of 1 Jan. 2021, prohibiting to collect biometric data such as facial recognition information.

On 1 Dec. 2020, the 24th meeting of the Standing Committee of the Tianjin Municipal People’s Congress passed and promulgated the Regulation of Social Credit of Tianjin Municipality (the Regulations, 天津市社会信用条例), which came into force as of 1 Jan. 2021.

The Regulation clarifies that the collection, classification, application, and relevant management of social credit information shall follow the principles of lawfulness, fairness, necessity, objectivity, and security, and must not infringe upon state secrets, trade secrets, personal privacy, and other personal information.

The Regulation specifically emphasizes that where market credit information providers collect the information of a natural person , they shall obtain the consent of the said person and they mutually agree on the purpose of use, unless otherwise provided by laws and administrative regulations.

Market credit information providers shall not collect natural persons’ religious beliefs, blood types, disease and medical history, biometric information, and other personal information that is prohibited to collect by laws and administrative regulations.

At present, the technology of facial recognition has been used widely in China. The Regulation issued at this stage, as stated by many Chinese media, means that collection of facial recognition data will be banned in Tianjin.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陈彦茹

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.