China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Can Foreign Arbitral Awards Be Enforced in China? - CTD 101 Series

Tue, 07 Dec 2021
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

avatar

Most of the foreign arbitral awards are enforceable in China.

In 2019, the foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced, with a success rate of 87.5%.

In 2018, the success rate is 87.5% too.

Original Link: Can Foreign Arbitral Awards Be Enforced in China?

China is a contracting state to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“New York Convention”), which means that an arbitral award made in other contracting states to the New York Convention can be enforced in China.

For the moment, most countries in the world are contracting states to the New York Convention. If you want to find out if the country where you live is also a contracting state to the New York Convention, please refer to the Contracting States List[] on the website, newyorkconvention.org.

Moreover, arbitral awards rendered in Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan are recognized and enforced pursuant to relevant arrangements between them and Mainland China.

Then, in practice, do Chinese courts show positive attitudes to foreign arbitral awards?

We believe that the answer is YES, and there is supporting data for our judgment.

We have analyzed the cases concerning recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards by Chinese courts in 2018 and 2019. The results are as follows:

In 2019, the Chinese courts have heard a total of 30 cases concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

Chinese courts have recognized and enforced, in whole or in part, foreign arbitral awards in 21 cases; and in three cases, Chinese courts have refused to recognize the awards or rejected the applications; and in the remaining six cases, the applications were either withdrawn by the applicants or concerned jurisdictional disputes.

In other words, a total of 24 cases went to substantive hearings, of which 21 involved the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, achieving a success rate of 87.5%.

More information on these cases can be found in our 2019 CJO Report: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in China.

In 2018, Chinese courts have heard a total of 25 cases in relation to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

Of these 25 cases:

in 14 cases, Chinese courts recognized ad enforced the foreign arbitral awards;

in 2 cases, the Chinese courts refused to recognize the foreign arbitral awards or dismissed the applications; and
in the other 9 cases, the applications were either withdrawn by the applicant or concerned with jurisdictional disputes.

There are 16 cases that actually proceeded to substantive adjudication. Among them, the foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced, with a success rate of 87.5%.

For more information on these cases, please read the 2018 CJO Report: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in China.

In addition, it should be noted that in accordance with the rule issued by the Supreme People’s Court of China, in supporting arbitration, an internal report and review mechanism is in place. Under this mechanism, if the local court intends to categorically reject the recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, it should report the case to its higher-level courts, that is, the higher courts. If the high court agrees with its position, it has to report the case to the Supreme People’s Court and obtain its approval before refusing to enforce the judgment.

However, if the district court intends to recognize a foreign arbitration award, it can make its decision on its own without any report.

Clearly, the internal report and review mechanism aims to prevent district courts from summarily rejecting such decisions.

Indeed, the mechanism has made local courts more cautious when refusing to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards.

This further demonstrates the friendly treatment of foreign arbitral awards in China.

 

 

The Cross-border Trade Dispute 101 Series (‘CTD 101 Series’) provides an introduction to China-related cross-border trade dispute, and covers the knowledge essential to cross-border trade dispute resolution and debt collection.

 

* * *

Do you need support in cross-border trade and debt collection?

CJO Global's team can provide you with China-related cross-border trade risk management and debt collection services, including: 
(1) Trade Dispute Resolution
(2) Debt Collection
(3) Judgments and Awards Collection
(4) Anti-Counterfeiting & IP Protection
(5) Company Verification and Due Diligence
(6) Trade Contract Drafting and Review

If you need our services, or if you wish to share your story, you can contact our Client Manager Susan Li (susan.li@yuanddu.com).

If you want to know more about CJO Global, please click here.

If you want to know more about CJO Global services, please click here.

If you wish to read more CJO Global posts, please click here.

 

 

Photo by yee yek on Unsplash

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises State Secrets Protection Law

China’s national legislature, the National People’s Congress, revised the State Secrets Protection Law to enhance information classification, secrecy in technological innovation, and precise protection of state secrets, effective May 1, 2024.

China Enhances Legal Aid Law Implementation

In November 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court and other top judicial bodies jointly issued measures to implement the Legal Aid Law, clarifying responsibilities and ensuring parties' rights to legal aid.