China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Annual Report 2019 on Judicial Review of Commercial Arbitration Highlights (3): Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Fri, 19 Nov 2021
Categories: Insights
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

avatar

On 23 Dec. 2020, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) published the  Annual Report on Judicial Review of Commercial Arbitration (2019) (the Report). Cases relating to recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in 2019 are introduced in Item 5 of Section VI, Part Three thereof.

These cases provide insight into how foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced in Chinese courts. 

China Annual Report 2019 on Judicial Review of Commercial Arbitration Highlights:

    1. Background;
    2. Laws, Rules, and Policies;
    3. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards;
    4. Judicial Review of Foreign-Related Arbitration Agreements.

Pursuant to the structure of the Report, the cases mentioned in the Report, together with links to their full texts are listed below.

In fact, we, China Justice Observer (CJO), have published the Annual Report on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (2018)

The following are the cases relating to recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards mentioned in the Report:

1. Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award Delivered by American Arbitration Association/International Centre for Dispute Resolution(ICDR) between Claimant Triton Container International Limited and Respondents Yangpu Economic Development Zone Development & Investment Holding Co., Ltd., et al.( 申请人特莱顿国际集装箱有限公司与被申请人洋浦经济开发区建设投资开发有限公司等申请承认与执行美国国际争议解决中心仲裁裁决案) Haikou Maritime Court (2015) Qiong Hai Fa Ta Zi No.1 Civil Ruling (December 30, 2019). 

2. Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award Delivered by International Commercial Arbitral Tribunal of Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry between Claimant Berdychiv Pte. Ltd. and Qingdao Jinrunqi Machinery Co., Ltd.( 申请人别尔基私人股份有限公司与被申请人青岛金润琪橡胶机械有限公司申请承认和执行乌克兰工商会国际商事仲裁院仲裁裁决案) Qingdao Intermediate People’s Court of Shandong Province (2019) Lu 02 Xie Wai Ren No. 4 Civil Ruling (March 11, 2019). 

3. Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award Delivered by Singapore International Arbitration Centre between Claimant IHS Global Limited and Respondent Xinjiang Markor Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.( 申请人信息管理服务全球有限公司与被申请人新疆美克化工股份有限公司申请承认和执行新加坡国际仲裁中心仲裁裁决案) Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People’s Court (2018) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No.23 Civil Ruling (March 12, 2019). 

4. Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Foreign Arbitral Award between Claimant VM Co., Ltd. and Respondent Jiangsu Zhonghui Import & Export Co., Ltd.( 申请人VM有限公司与被申请人江苏中汇进出口有限公司申请承认外国仲裁裁决案) Wuhan Maritime Court (2018) E 72 Xie Wai Ren No.1.1 Civil Ruling (May 15, 2019). 

5. the Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award Delivered by Singapore International Chamber of Commerce International Court of Arbitration between Claimant South Pacific Ventures FZE and Respondent Panjin Liaohe Oilfield Kyte Petroleum Equipment Co., Ltd.( 申请人南太平洋风险投资有限公司与被申请人盘锦辽河油田凯特石油设备有限公司申请承认和执行新加坡国际商会国际仲裁院仲裁裁决案) Dalian Intermediate People’s Court of Liaoning Province (2019) Liao 02 Xie Wai Ren No. 8 Civil Ruling (December 3, 2019)

6. Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award No. 17-04 (Tokyo) Delivered by the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association between Claimant Daiho Sangyo Inc. and Respondent Shandong Haohan Energy Co., Ltd.( 申请人大宝产业株式会社与被申请人山东浩瀚能源有限公司申请承认日本商事仲裁协会东京17-04号仲裁裁决案) Rizhao Intermediate People’s Court of Shandong Province (2018) Lu 11 Xie Wai Ren No. 3 Civil Ruling (December 25, 2019) 

7. Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award Delivered by Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce between Claimant Changsheng Trade Co., Ltd. and Respondent Henan Jianghe Machinery Co., Ltd.( 申请人昌盛贸易公司与被申请人河南江河机械有限责任公司申请承认和执行瑞典斯德哥尔摩商会仲裁院仲裁裁决案) Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Henan Province (2017) Yu 01 Xie Wai Ren No.11 Civil Ruling (March 27, 2019)

8. Two cases of Application for Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award Delivered by the British Coffee Association between Claimant Maoda Merchandise Co., Ltd. and Respondent Harmony Beijing Arts & Crafts Import & Export Co., Ltd. (申请人贸达商品有限公司与被申请人北京和美汉艺进出口有限责任公司申请承认和执行英国咖啡协会仲裁裁决两案) Beijing Higher People’s Court (2018) Jing Min Xia Zhong No. 251, No.252 Civil Rulings (November 23, 2018).

 

Photo by Elina Sitnikova on Unsplash

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC's Revised Rules Extend Reach of International Commercial Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People’s Court's newly amended provisions extended the reach of its International Commercial Courts (CICC). To establish a valid choice of court agreement, three requirements must be met - the international nature, the agreement in writing, and the amount in controversy - while the 'actual connection' is no longer required.

China’s Wenzhou Court Recognizes a Singapore Monetary Judgment

In 2022, a local Chinese court in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, ruled to recognize and enforce a monetary judgment made by the Singapore State Courts, as highlighted in one of the typical cases related to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) recently released by China’s Supreme People’s Court (Shuang Lin Construction Pte. Ltd. v. Pan (2022) Zhe 03 Xie Wai Ren No.4).

2023 Asia-Pacific Regional Arbitration Group Conference Opens in Beijing

In November 2023, the 2023 Asia-Pacific Regional Arbitration Group Conference (APRAG) kicked off in Beijing, focusing on international arbitration amid changing times, with China's Ministry of Justice announcing plans for an International Commercial Arbitration Center pilot project and Beijing's commitment to providing comprehensive legal services.

Legal Crossroads: Canadian Court Denies Summary Judgment for Chinese Judgment Recognition When Faced with Parallel Proceedings

In 2022, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Canada refused to grant summary judgment to enforce a Chinese monetary judgment in the context of two parallel proceedings in Canada, indicating that the two proceedings should proceed together as there was factual and legal overlap, and triable issues involved defenses of natural justice and public policy (Qingdao Top Steel Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Fasteners & Fittings Inc. 2022 ONSC 279).