China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Annual Report 2019 on Judicial Review of Commercial Arbitration Highlights (4): Judicial Review of Foreign-Related Arbitration Agreements

Fri, 19 Nov 2021
Categories: Insights
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

avatar

On 23 Dec. 2020, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) published the  Annual Report on Judicial Review of Commercial Arbitration (2019) (the Report). Case heard by Chinese courts for judicial review of foreign-related arbitration agreements in 2019 are introduced in Items 1-4 of Section VI, Part Three thereof.

China Annual Report 2019 on Judicial Review of Commercial Arbitration Highlights:

    1. Background;
    2. Laws, Rules, and Policies;
    3. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards;
    4. Judicial Review of Foreign-Related Arbitration Agreements.

These cases provide insight into how Chinese courts review foreign-related arbitration agreements in practice.

Pursuant to the structure of the Report, the cases mentioned in the Report, together with links to their full texts are provided below.

1. Application for Determining the Validity of Arbitration Agreement between Claimant Luck Treat Co., Ltd. and Respondent Shenzhen Zhongyuancheng Commercial Investment Holdings Co., Ltd. (申请人运裕有限公司与被申请人深圳市中苑城商业投资控股有限公司申请确认仲裁协议效力案), Supreme People’s Court (2019) Zui Gao Fa Min Te No.1 Civil Ruling (September 18, 2019).

2. Application for Determining the Validity of Arbitration Agreement between Claimant Newpower Enterprises Inc. Co., Ltd. and Respondent Shenzhen Zhongyuancheng Commercial Investment Holdings Co., Ltd. (申请人新劲企业公司与被申请人深圳市中苑城商业投资控股有限公司申请确认仲裁协议效力案), Supreme People’s Court (2019) Zui Gao Fa Min Te No.2 Civil Ruling (September 18, 2019).

3. Application for Determining the Validity of Arbitration Agreement between Claimants Beijing CTS H.K. Metropark Hotels Management Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Metropark Jinghua Hotel Co., Ltd. and Respondent Shenzhen Zhongyuancheng Commercial Investment Holdings Co., Ltd. (申请人北京港中旅维景国际酒店管理有限公司、深圳维景京华酒店有限公司与被申请人深圳市中苑城商业投资控股有限公司申请确认仲裁协议效力案) Supreme People’s Court (2019) Zui Gao Fa Min Te No.3 Civil Ruling (September 18, 2019).

4. Application for Determining the Validity of an Arbitration Agreement between Claimant Henan Kanghui Aviation Technology Co., Ltd. and Respondent Jetstar Pacific Airlines, Inc. (申请人河南康辉航空科技有限公司与被申请人捷星太平洋航空股份有限公司申请确认仲裁协议效力案) Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Henan Province (2019) Yu 01 Min Te No. 18 Civil Ruling (August 26, 2019) 

 

Photo by zhang kaiyv on Unsplash

Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Releases Typical Cases of Judicial Review of Arbitration

In January 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released ten typical cases of judicial review of arbitration, aiming to unify the standards for judicial review of arbitration across the country. Among others, Case No.1 shows that the Chinese court confirmed the validity of an arbitration agreement despite an unregistered company seal.

Decoding the Turning Point: A Closer Look at China’s Recognition of Japanese Bankruptcy

This follow-up article focuses on the Chinese Court's detailed review of the Shanghai International Corporation case in 2023, highlighting the significance of reciprocity in cross-border bankruptcy proceedings and underscoring China's evolving approach to recognizing foreign judgments (See In re Shanghai International Corporation (2021) Hu 03 Xie Wai Ren No.1).

SPC Interprets International Treaties & Practices in Chinese Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) reaffirmed the supremacy of international treaties over domestic laws in foreign-related civil and commercial cases with its “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of International Treaties and International Practices”(关于审理涉外民商事案件适用国际条约和国际惯例若干问题的解释).

SPC's Revised Rules Extend Reach of International Commercial Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People’s Court's newly amended provisions extended the reach of its International Commercial Courts (CICC). To establish a valid choice of court agreement, three requirements must be met - the international nature, the agreement in writing, and the amount in controversy - while the 'actual connection' is no longer required.