China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Clarifies Jurisdiction of Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court—China’s Third Financial Court

Mon, 09 Jan 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 20 Dec. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court released the “Provisions on Case Jurisdiction of the Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court” (关于成渝金融法院案件管辖的规定) to clarify this court’s scope of jurisdiction.

As of 2022, China has established three financial courts: the Shanghai Financial Court, the Beijing Financial Court, and the Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court.

Related Posts:

The Shanghai Financial Court and Beijing Financial Court mainly accept local financial cases, while the Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court has jurisdiction over both Chongqing and Chengdu, the two largest cities in southwest China.

Cases under the jurisdiction of the Chengdu-Chongqing Financial Court include:

  • Local financial cases: financial civil and commercial cases of first instance and finance-related administrative cases of first instance which shall be under the jurisdiction of intermediate people’s courts in Chongqing Municipality and Sichuan Province within the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle;
  • Foreign-related financial cases: lawsuits initiated by domestic investors on the grounds that securities issuance and trading activities or futures and derivatives trading activities outside China have harmed their legitimate rights and interests, or on the grounds that the financial products sold or the financial services provided by overseas financial institutions have harmed their legitimate rights and interests.

 

Cover Photo by Hu Chen on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.