China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Establish International Organization for Mediation With Its Preparatory Office in HK

Tue, 04 Apr 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The Preparatory Office of the International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) was established in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region on 16 Feb. 2023.

Related post:

According to the “Joint Statement on the Future Establishment of the International Organization for Mediation” (关于建立国际调解院的联合声明) signed by China and various foreign states last year, the Preparatory Office of the IOMed was established in Hong Kong to carry out preparatory work for its establishment.

Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang (秦刚) stated that the IOMed will be the world’s first intergovernmental legal organization dedicated to resolving international disputes through mediation. It will transcend the limit of litigation and arbitration in which one side wins and the other loses, and it aims to achieve win-win cooperation between disputing parties, which is of high significance for promoting world peace, security and development as well as stability of the international order.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yufeng Fei on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)