China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Final Ruling Made in China: Return of a Mummified Buddha Statue

Wed, 07 Sep 2022
Editor: C. J. Observer

On 19 July 2022, the Fujian High People's Court, as the court of the second instance, rendered the final judgment in the case of the mummified Buddha Statue of Zhanggong Zushi (章公祖师, hereinafter ‘the Statue’), upholding the trial court judgment made by Sanming Intermediate People's Court, and ruling that the defendant Oscar Van Overeem, a Dutch collector, should return the Statue back to Chinese villagers.

Related Posts:

After the death in the Northern Song Dynasty, Zhanggong Zushi was mummified into a golden Buddha statue and enshrined in Puzhao Temple (普照堂), which was owned jointly by Yangchun Village and Dongpu Village in Wushan Township, Datian County. In December 2015, the Statue was found stolen by local villagers. The defendant claimed that he bought the Statue in Amsterdam, Netherlands, in 1996, without the relevant proof of purchase.

In March 2015, the Statue was publicly exhibited at the Hungarian Museum of Natural Science with the permission of the defendant, nearly 20 years after being stolen.

On 26 July 2018, the Sanming Intermediate People's Court of Fujian Province held a public hearing and made a ruling on 4 Dec. 2020.

The court of first instance ordered the defendant to return the Statue to the plaintiff Yangchun Villagers' Committee and Dongpu Villagers' Committee within 30 days from the effective date of the judgment. The defendant subsequently appealed to the High Court in Fujian.

The court of second instance held that the Statue is an illegally exported cultural object, and has multiple attributes of human remains, historical cultural relics and consecrated objects, which reflected the traditions and legacy of southern Fujian in China. As a long-term consecrated object worshipped by the local villagers, the Statue has been given special bonding and significance, and therefore, should be returned as stipulated by the law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Binyu Liu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.