China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Shanghai Maritime Court Issues Guidelines for Blockchain Evidence Review

Wed, 16 Nov 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 29 Sept. 2022, Shanghai Maritime Court held a symposium on “The Impact of Blockchain Technology’s Application on Maritime Justice and Relevant Service Guarantee Needs” and released the “Guidelines for Blockchain Evidence Review” (hereinafter the “Guidelines”, 区块链证据审查指南).

Chinese courts attach great importance to the role of blockchain in judicial activities, especially in evidence preservation, cross-department data sharing, mutual trust, and other areas.

As the evidence preservation services provided by judicial blockchain and third-party blockchain platforms greatly facilitate litigation, the electronic evidence stored on blockchain has been recognized by Chinese courts in judicial practice.

Earlier in this May, China’s Supreme People’s Court issued the “Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Strengthening the Judicial Application of Blockchain” (hereinafter the “Opinions”, 最高人民法院关于加强区块链司法应用的意见), which refines the rules for the judicial application of blockchain.

On the basis of the Opinions, the Shanghai Maritime Court formulated the Guidelines, thereby introducing blockchain evidence to maritime trials.

In addition to the judicial blockchain platforms and third-party preservation platforms which are currently widely applied, the Guidelines also considers the electronic evidence generated by blockchain bills of lading, port management, cross-border settlement and other application platforms.

 

 

Cover Photo by Night Glow on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.