China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

SPC Adjusts Jurisdiction of Its IP Court

Tue, 26 Mar 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 Oct. 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued “Decisions to Amend the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Intellectual Property Court” (关于修改最高人民法院关于知识产权法庭若干问题的规定的决定).

Related Posts:

According to the amended rules, the jurisdiction of the SPC’s Intellectual Property Court is as follows.

I. The Intellectual Property Court shall hear the following appeal cases including:

  1. administrative appeals relating to the granting or confirmation of patents, new plant varieties, or integrated circuit layout designs;
  2. civil or administrative appeals relating to the ownership of and infringement upon invention patents, new plant varieties, integrated circuit layout designs;
  3. major or complicated civil or administrative appeals relating to the ownership of and infringement upon utility model patents, technical know-how, or computer software; and
  4. civil or administrative appeals relating to monopolies.

II. The Intellectual Property Court shall hear other cases including:

  1. major and complicated civil and administrative cases of first instance nationwide of the types as mentioned in the preceding paragraph;
  2. cases of petition for retrial, protest, and retrial where the trial supervision procedure is applicable with respect to legally effective judgments, rulings, and consent awards of civil and administrative cases of first instance as mentioned in the preceding paragraph;
  3. cases on disputes over the jurisdiction of civil and administrative cases of first instance as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, applications for the reconsideration of conduct preservation rulings, reconsideration of fines or detention decisions, and extension of trial periods, among others; and
  4. such other cases as the SPC deems necessary to be heard by the Intellectual Property Court.

 

 

Photo by Diego Jimenez on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.